In chapter six of the book The New
Urban Sociology, the authors tell us about suburbanization and the timeline of
life in suburbia throughout the years. The book talks about the concept of
white flight; where white families moved out of neighborhoods in the cities and
moved into suburbs where the quality of life was better. In the same way, black
families were migrating north from the south and they began to occupy the inner
cities. Abraham Levitt and his sons used their construction company to build
the first suburb and pioneer the American Dream. However, Levitt’s company did
not want to let black or other minority families live in the suburb because
they feared it would bring down the value of the neighborhood. They were also
afraid that selling the houses to black families would make it more difficult
for them to sell to white buyers. They began to screen their applicants for
race in order to keep the neighborhood white.
The racially segregated suburbs of the 1950’s are long gone, but we still see a big racial divide in many different cities. For example, in Chicago, the city is not only divided among racial lines, but by class and socioeconomic lines as well. The city of Chicago is literally divided by expressways, with the north side of the city in one direction and the south side in the other direction. When driving down the expressway you can literally see the divide as you travel father north or farther south.
While I was reading, I began to
wonder about how Chicago is segregated, and which areas of the city had which
type of people. In an article called “A Colorized View of the Racial Divide in
Chicago” (http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2014/04/28/a-colorized-view-of-the-racial-divide-in-chicago/)
there is a map that illustrates all the
different areas of the city and what the demographics of each area look like. In
this article you can see exactly who lives in which parts of the city. I also
found a blog post about the early suburbs and how they operated. It’s titled,
“The Racial Make-up of Suburbanization” (http://social.rollins.edu/wpsites/thirdsight/2013/11/15/the-racial-make-up-of-suburbanization/)
and it cites the rise of suburbanization as well as the racially divided
aspects of suburbia. The blog cites classic American TV shows such as Leave It To Beaver as examples that the
ideas of Levitt were reflected in American popular culture. The blog also
provides a lot of historic photos to illustrate the ideas behind
suburbanization in the 1950’s.
I also thought about how life in
the suburbs is viewed today, thinking that it might be viewed differently than
the escape that it was originally compared to. While thinking about that, I
remembered the Disney channel original movie Stuck in the Suburbs. The movie is about a teenage girl who hates
her seemingly routine life in the suburbs all while fan girling over the lead
singer of a band. She ends up accidentally switching phones with the singer, and
subsequently her entire life is thrown in the air as she experiences life as a
famous celebrity. Eventually she and the singer exchange the right phones and
she ends up appreciating her normal life.
I thought of this movie because I think today, there is a shift in
people moving out of the suburbs and back into the city. Before, young couples
wanted to live a quiet life in the suburbs. Now, it seems as if the grandchildren
of those young couples are longing for a more exciting , fast paced life. I
also think about my own experience growing up in the suburbs and I realize that
I have no desire for suburban life. Instead, I want to live where there’s
action, and always something to do.
Overall, I feel as though you did a great job connecting your blog post with some important ideas within Chapter 6. White Flight was clearly defined in the early part of your blog which really showed the direction you wanted to take with this entry. I would have gone into a bit more detail about why whites were leaving the cities, branching outwards to suburbs, and also some specific reasons as to why black families were moving north. There were more reasons as to why people fled from cities other than to seek a better quality of life. For example, many branched outwards in order to capitalize on areas of land that were undeveloped. Many saw outskirts of cities as an opportunity to invest in real estate and to also solve problems of city living. Industrial capitalism has been around since the 1800s, and this is related to suburbanization. Thorstien Veblen (1899), introduced the term "conspicuous consumption" referring to the space in suburban areas. Owning a piece of land in these areas was a sign of wealth and excess. People who owned this land were wealthy. It can be applied to more modern individuals as well. Part of the "American Dream" is to own property of your own. It is what we are basically conditioned and socialized to want when we learn about topics like this in school. We are conditioned to want these things at a young age. The concept of suburbanization is a little bit deeper than just people wanting to move away from a city. It also was not just people who were moving away from large cities, it was businesses as well.
ReplyDeleteI like how you introduced the Levitt's into the blog. They were the first people to construct subdivisions on a huge scale. You tied this well with the previously stated concept of white flight. The Levitt's perpetuated discrimination with their subdivisions which made more people want to live there; an all white area. I believe that the Levitt's are partially responsible for the mass exiting of cities because they were able to provide amenities for those who were in pursuit of the "American Dream".
Chicago is a perfect city to examine racial segregation, and the article and info-graphic you provided was great. I would have like to see you expand and explain a little more about the details of the article because it is perfect for this blog entry. The articecl provides more information as to why suburbs were created: an influx of people returning from WWII, eager to begin their lives with spouses and start families. Suburbs were the perfect place to do just that.
And lastly, I believe that the Disney movie you used as an example could have been tied into the main arguments that you presented in this blog a little better. I personally haven't seen this movie, so it is important to remember that readers might not be familiar with material that you are trying to relate and convey.
All in all, I think that you did a good job tying in what we have read about with more contemporary articles and examples. Nice work Staci!