For a long time there has been much debate over whether
public policies are necessary or not. Do people know right from wrong enough to
prevent government intervention? Does the government intervene too much? I
think the middle of this lies with the question: If the government continues to
create public policies will the people ever have the chance to prove that they
can handle the responsibility on their own? I feel as if they have possibly
given people this option before and that is how they decided public policy
needed to happen. Think of it this way how did it become a problem if it was
not for us. There has to be a reason that water is running out or that pollution
is getting worse. When does the government decided enough is enough. There is
much political debate over the role the government should have with the
liberals and conservatives having conflicting ideas again. Liberals are in
favor of public policy and believe in a larger presence from the government and
their input. Conservatives on the other hand are for limited government
intervention and believe that public policy is just another way for the
government to try and gain complete control. Just like any other political
debate I do not think there is any
one right answer and it would be better for everyone if there was a happy
medium.
I
also like the example that Gottdiener, Hutchinson, and Ryan use about the
recycle bins in a community. They say that some communities have rules that enforce
recycling within households and if the members of those houses do not comply
they could be forced to pay fines. It seems like a personal decision whether
you want to recycle or not and some people would agree that you cannot force
your beliefs on others, but the regulations are allowed because recycling
benefits the greater good. The idea is that is for he benefit of everyone to
protect our resources and the environment because once it is gone it is gone
forever.
They
also talk about uneven development and urban policy implying that policies
support and help the wealthy while the poor continue to be hurt or
unprotected. The example of life
saving drugs only being provided to those that can pay really made me think of
how unfair poverty can be. It is no surprise that poverty is an issues that
people within urban areas face, but we also know how disproportionate it is to
minorities. This example makes it seem as if the lives of black and Hispanic men
and women do not matter. How bad does that sound? These policies are supposed
to be for the greater good of all people yet even with things such as welfare
and Medicaid not all people in poverty could afford a drug that could save
their life. They also talk about how these government programs may address the
problems that the poor are facing, but they do not suggest or provide the
proper solutions.
They offer a simple solution that
will maybe reduce the problem but not fix it, because fixing the problems with
the poor would likely having to take money from the rich. The government would
never allow taking money from the rich to help the poor because they are part
of that rich culture or the rich people are the ones running their campaigns. Most
educated explinations would say simply taking money from the rich and giving it
to the poor is not the answer or solution. I do not think it works quite like
the animated Robin Hood movie we might have seen as children. Money seems to be
the solution to all, but it is important to understand that people need to want
a change and to prevent problems in the first place.
I like the way this link explains the work of public policy
and how they do what they can do without completely failing or completely
solving the problems. It also talks about why taking from the rich will not
have the effect on helping the poor that people think.
This video is kind of awesome. She talks about trying to
make public policy more fun since it I such a heavy topic of the United States
problems. The biggest problem is she uses words like wicked, and says we have
more than “99 problems” like the song lyrics “99 problems but a b*tch ain’t one”.
Once you get past all of the terrible attempts to be fun the video explains the
problems with the way public policy is enforced.
Samantha, I really like your blog post. I think that the link provided that talks about the ways that taking money from the poor wouldn't have the effects that we like to imagine was a nice touch and it was definitely helpful. I liked your connection to Robin Hood and public policy, I think that was a great and relateable example. However, I wish that you would have explained a specific example or instance from Robin Hood and then connected it back to public policy. Other than that I think you did a really good job on the post.
ReplyDeleteSam, I think your blog did a really good job implementing reasons of how policy making can be a negative affect. Also, how policies mainly help the wealthy and forget leave the poor high and dry. This doesnt help any problems we are facing. Money is such a huge impact on our world and the saying money can change someone is true. Poor people act differently than wealthy people and most of the time you see wealthy people much happier. Give someone 100$ and their face is going to light up. Its sad how much money influences our society. I think if the dependency on money decreased then some of our problems would too.
ReplyDelete