Reading
chapter 5 of the "New Urban Sociology," I found it really interesting
how they talked about the rise of the metropolis, which occurred from 1920 to
1960. During this time period, cities started to develop more horizontally
rather than vertically. This means that cities were less concerned about
building taller buildings and more concerned expanding the city's limits. This
led to what the book calls "the US urban system consisted of a select
group of large cities with populations ranging from several hundred thousand to
over 7 Million. This pattern represents balanced urbanization that is characteristic of the older industrialized
countries such as England." (124). One of the biggest reasons that balanced
urbanization took place was because of the changes in demographic
differentiation. The book talks about how the change in the complexion of
metropolitan demographics between 1930 and 1960. There was a mass exodus of
black people from the south to the north in search of a better life. Millions
of black people migrated from southern plantation states to northern and
western states. The books states that blacks moved because they were “attracted
by the possibility of jobs in the newly booming military industries.” This part
of the book reminded me of the Black Panther Party and how they were formed
around that time period. There were actually founded in 1966, 6 years after the
period was over. However, the reasons why the Black Panther Party was founded
were happening during the time period of the rise of the metropolis. This past
weekend I watched the Super bowl and I got to see the Half-time show which
featured Coldplay, Bruno mars, but the night was won by Beyoncé (whose family
is from the south, her father from Alabama and her mother from Lousiana). Beyoncé came out during the half-time
show flanked by a host of young dancers and everyone was dressed in all black,
leather outfits. They did a dance routine and paid tribute to the Black Lives
Matter movement and the Black Panther Party movement. She also performed her
new song that she had released the day before called “Formation,” in which she
states “You mix that Negro with that Creole the make a Texas Bama, I like my
baby heir with baby hair and afros, I like my Negro nose with Jackson Five
nostrils.” In my personal opinion, the half-time performance by all of the
performers was amazing and had positive vibes throughout the show despite some
microphone issues during the Bruno Mars segment. However, after the show there
apparently was a lot of controversy surrounding the show, Beyoncé’s part in
particular. Almost immediately after the half-time show, it seemed, memes about
Beyoncé’s performance started popping up. People took to Twitter, Facebook and
other social media sites to provide their opinion on the show. A lot of people
had positive opinions about the show, like I had, but there were a great deal
of people who believed that Beyoncé’s wardrobe choice and song choice was too
controversial for something so popular show like the Super bowl half time show.
Then the ridiculousness started. People started calling Beyonce a racist for
paying tribute to the Black Panther Party. The overlying justification seemed
to be that if it had been a white group who had come out and performed in the
white sheets and hoodies, there would be an uproar and the band would immediately
be labeled racist. To compare the Black Panther Party to the Klu Klux Klan
seems utterly ridiculous to me. The History and mission for the two groups are
very different. One the one hand you have the Black Panther Party, was founded
as a result of the huge black immigration that lead a lot of black people to California
which led to the urbanization of the cities there, such as Oakland, Los Angeles
and Watts. The “urban ghettos,” that became home to many blacks were densely
populated and became epicenters of racism and discrimination. In order to fight
against these injustices Huey P Newton and Bobby Seale formed the Party in 1966
in order to protect black people from racial discrimination in the form of police
brutality specifically. If you take a look at the history of the Klu Klux Klan
you can see that it started as early as 1867 by white southerners who had lost
the civil war and still believed that blacks should be slaves. The Klu Klux
Klan is a white supremacist group that has been labeled a hate group and has
been responsible for killing thousands of minorities, whom they believe are
inferior to the white race, in the United States. As you can see the Black
Panther Party was a group that fought for equality in the country and the Klu
Klux Klan is a hate group whose aim is to see white people reign supreme over
every other non-white race in this country, making the comparisons between the
two utterly ridiculous.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3445116/Queen-cynicism-No-stunt-s-shameless-Beyonce-accused-trying-look-white-week-posed-heroine-black-power.html
http://www.thenation.com/article/october-15-1966-the-black-panther-party-is-founded/
I think your summary and connection to the readings was good and the link to the history of the black panther party provided much needed background information. I think the information was focused down to one or two topics of the readings well. Your opinions seemed to be well thought out and articulated. I am not quite sure if you meant to connect the horizontal expansion to the norther migration, but I just sort of missed the connection if there was one. I get there was more people and they needed the space, but that does not explain why they changed from up to out and maybe the book did not state that either.
ReplyDeleteI am not thrilled that the halftime show and Beyonce were brought up, because I have already witnessed so much of the madness and I honestly could care less about what these celebrities are doing. That being said I think that celebrities like Beyonce use their fame to persuade people to think and feel the way that they do. I do not think that people always think out the way they do things. Is comparing her to the KKK too intense? Some people may think so and others may not. I refuse to take a stand either way. I am just simply saying that when people present their stand and they believe greatly in it that they do not always look at the other sides perspective and do not take the time to understand how it affects them.
Again nothing against your blog and your opinion and I hope you take the time to understand mine as well. I think overall your blog was very well written and easy to understand.